|
One
of the reddest of herrings to distract the occasional traveler along the
pathway to understanding "poetry & jazz," "jazz text," or whatever other
uncomfortable name we might use for this particular performance genre,
has been left by poets (from Kenne th Rexroth right on into tonight's
set at the Nuyorican Cafe) who have insisted on giving elaborate explanations
of their adaptive methodology. Having heard these explanations, an audience
might well expect poets who have recorded with musicians to sound considerably
different from their solo performances. Most clearly do not. Poets who
ordinarily read in that annoying "poetic" voice we have all come to recognize
from the reading circuit, as well as the most "out" of performance poets,
tend to perform the ir verses pretty much the same way whether accompanied
by musicians or only by the music of their own muses, and it's about time
that everybody concerned finally recognized that there's nothing wrong
with that.
Nathaniel Mackey, Yusef
Komunyakaa, and Jayn e Cortez are all poets deeply influenced by music;
influenced in that strictest and most beautiful of dictionary senses,
they have experienced an "inflow," have felt the authority of often invisible
means. While they may have much to say about the particularities of fitting
their voices among the other instruments of these recordings, most of
the work of "the music," as we used to term it, had already influenced
the writing of the verses before anybody brought out a microphone. The
poets' idioms were already organized around the rhythms they had felt
in the inflow, as can be heard most immediately in those poems of Komunyakaa's
recorded without musical accompaniment. His reading of those poems is
much like his reading when Tchicai and company play alo ng with him, but
that's because he'd heard them before he wrote. And they had all heard
the blues. As Kalamu ya Salaam says in his own recent recording, My Story,
My Song, "the blues is our birth certificate."
There is no mistaking the
parents of these ly rics. Love Notes from the Madhouse underscores this
theme by beginning with the human voice, which is slowly joined by percussion
and the distinctive bass of Fred Hopkins. This set was recorded live in
Chicago in 1997, and it stands as one of the most successful live recordings
of poetry and jazz to have been released. The risks of live recording
are somewhat lessened in this day of easy digital correction, but there
is still the sense in listening to these tracks that the poet and musicians
were, aft er years spent deep in the shed, ready for whatever their audience
and venue might provoke. In the tradition of acknowledging jazz tradition
(ever listen to one of those long Sonny Rollins solos?), the poetry and
the instrumental passages all summon a host of lively spirits. Komunyakaa
asks if a $500 suit would keep him from standing in Robert J ohnson's
shoes. (To judge from the cover photograph, this is an amusingly rhetorical
question.) John Tchicai's bass clarinet (he's holding it in the cover
photograph) mimics Eric Dolphy's flights of bird calls on "Dolphy's Aviary
/ Malachite." The classic tenor opening on "Blood Count," a Billy Strayhorn
composition, recalls the era of "classic jazz" while the ghostly keyboard
effects on "Hypothesis" sound like the specter of Sun Ra.
Komunyakaa's readings on
the disk are uniformly effective, with and without the music, and the
sheer sense of the event has been captured by this recording as effectively
as earlier recordings caught the greatest live moments of Dolphy and Mingus.
Tchicai has long experience working with text, going back more than thirty
years to his recordings with Amiri Baraka and the New York Art Quartet,
and that experience is evidenced by the great responsiveness of his playing
to Komunyakaa's words. The other musici ans are equal to the leaders on
this date. Hopkins is as lyric as ever he was with Air or with his own
later groups. That's Margriet Naber-Tchicai behind those eerie keyboards,
and Jeff Parker plays a great, harmolodic-sounding guitar feature on "Finding
the Path." The only sour note to my ear is a spoken chorus at one point
that sounds a bit too much like the responsive reading in a church that
isn't sure of its text, a bit of groping for the right rhythms that is
in sharp contrast to the incredible ensemble passag es elsewhere (the
tight guitar and winds that roar in after Komunyakaa's reading in "Dolphy's
Aviary / Malachite" or the tight interplay among reeds, keys, and guitar
on "Hypothesis").
|